The Church of England has established two key points regarding euthanasia. Secondly, physicians do not have to do everything to keep a human being alive despite the fact that there are apprehensions about quality of life. A statement issued in the year emphasized that critical decisions regarding life and death of a person should be made with the consensus of everyone involved.
It is the duty of the State as well as a Christian duty to protect the weak and most vulnerable in society, specifically those who may regard themselves to be a burden on others. The Roman Catholic Church has candidly stated its position on euthanasia stating that the practice is wrong because all life is sacred and a gift of God. As such, only God can take the life of a person and humans have no such right.
- williams college research paper?
- georgia tech electronic thesis and dissertation archive;
- Euthanasia-Discursive Essay?
- Euthanasia Essay | Bartleby.
- essay on classroom diversity!
- Argumentative Essay on Euthanasia: Tips from Successful Authors.
- Arguments Against Euthanasia Analysis Philosophy Essay.
Any act contrary to this intentionally secures the death of a person and is only murder. However, euthanasia cannot be said in totality as unethical.
Unique Topics For An Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia
Both active and passive euthanasia can be acceptable in some cases when certain conditions are adhered to. Kappel observes that doctors should be allowed to perform legal euthanasia when such moral conditions have been fulfilled. People who are opposed to euthanasia should not just view it fully as killing because in some cases, the doctors just allow the patient to die. Those opposed to euthanasia are concerned that in euthanasia performed is impure and unethical, including ending of life of a patient without consent. This is sometimes true because in the society sometimes people flout rules and regulations.
However, existence of such cases do not justify that euthanasia ought to be totally banned.
It only requires for stringent measures to be put in place to reduce such cases. People who are found to flout the rules and regulations should be punished. People who hold religious views seem opposed to euthanasia because it goes against the right to life. They are opposed to patients requesting the doctors to terminate their lives in case of serious illness because they see this as in opposition to widely held belief that our live are in the destiny of God.
Opposition to euthanasia see people as taking advantage of euthanasia to use it as possible technical fix for suffering, disability, indignity and the epitome of the belief that we can control our destiny. People may sometimes abuse the use of euthanasia, although rarely, since it is administered by qualified doctors only if a treatment is futile.
Medical advancements play a big role in ensuring that people live longer, but sometimes we have to concede that everyone at one point has to die. Medical advancements should not be used to prolong the suffering of patients, and then they eventually die without recovering.
In most cases, assisted suicide is often viewed as the most logical case when a patient is faced with this situation. Those opposed to euthanasia ought to realize that people have the right to live and the right to die. Human beings have a right to self-determination, which includes making a choice when to die. Those opposed to euthanasia, however, do not agree with this because of ethical and moral reasons. Some believe that if such powers were to be left to human beings, the world would be spoilt, and that is why God chose to make the day of death a secret.
The paper has discussed the concept of euthanasia based on research of sources available in literature.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
Ethical views of both proponents and opponents have been presented. The religious stance has also been presented in the paper. We accept all kinds of custom papers and we do not turn our customers away. Academic papers urgently needed are welcome. Support reviews all essays and academic papers to make sure general requirements such as grammar and format are followed. Students ranging from highschool to Doctoral level can have their essays and custom academic papers done here. All prices have a 50 percent discount of the industry rates for 1 year!
Write a paper on euthanasia: An essay Published under category: Writing Help Convenience UTC Context: Euthanasia Controversy Euthanasia is among the most debated issues in academic institutions such as university and college. Euthanasia is usually only conducted on a person with an incurable condition, however there are other instances when euthanasia can be carried out.
In many countries, such as the UK, it is illegal to assist anyone in killing themselves. Should a terminally ill patient in a great deal of pain and discomfort be allowed to terminate their life, if that is what the patient desires? And who has the right to deny a patient who is in complete suffering a less painful ending to their lives? These questions cause a huge amount of controversy, and have been strongly debated.
Those in favour of euthanasia argue that it should be up to the patient, whereas those against argue that euthanasia could be misused, leading to very disturbing situations.
Should Euthanasia Be Practiced?
A strong ethical argument against the use of euthanasia is that it could soon become a slippery slope, with the legalisation of involuntary euthanasia following it. There is also concern that doctors could end up killing very sick patients without asking for their permission, and in the worst case scenario, begin to kill off patients to free up beds in hospitals, or to save money. These situations show how dangerous it could be to let the legalisation of euthanasia lead into the legalisation of involuntary euthanasia. On the other side of the debate, there is a strong argument that people should have the right to terminate their lives, whenever, and however they may wish.
Many supporters of voluntary euthanasia believe that everyone has the right to control their body and life, and should be free to decide at what time, and in which manner they will die. The idea behind this is that unnecessary restraints on human rights should be avoided.
So long as the patient is lucid, and his or her intent is clear beyond doubt, there need be no further questions. Supporters of this believe that if euthanasia promotes the best interests of all the parties concerned, and no human rights are violated, then it is morally acceptable for voluntary euthanasia to take place.
Another argument against euthanasia, this time a practical one, is that euthanasia is not needed when proper palliative care is available. Terminally ill patients are given drugs and other types of support to help relieve the physical pain and mental effects of being terminally ill.
Arguments For And Against Euthanasia Essay
If this palliative care is competent then it may be able to relieve the patient of a lot of pain and discomfort, and will give the patient a better quality of life. Effective palliative care will give the patient and their loved ones chances to spend quality time together, and will allow the patient to live the remaining part of their lives with as much of the distress and pain felt by a terminally ill patient removed as possible.
Some argue, however, that along with the introduction of euthanasia, there could be a reduction in the availability of palliative care, as euthanasia is more cost effective than prolonging the life of dying patients. This could possibly reduce the availability of care for terminally ill patients who do not wish to be euthanised. Some supporters of the legalisation of euthanasia have put forward another point, they argue that if we can place aside the notion that death can in no way be something positive, we are able to consider that it can in certain cases be a better option than keeping a patient that is in terrible pain and discomfort alive.
If death is not always seen to be the worst outcome, then many of the objections to euthanasia no longer exist, since many of the arguments rely on the notion that death cannot be a good outcome. People generally avoid death because they enjoy and value being alive, but in the case of a terminally ill patient, they may be in a lot of discomfort and pain, and are unable to enjoy their life.